Review: Hand to Mouth, by Linda Tirado

Publisher:	G.P. Putnam's Sons
Copyright:	October 2014
ISBN:	0-698-17528-X
Format:	Kindle
Pages:	194

The first time Linda Tirado came to the viral attention of the Internet was in 2013 when she responded to a forum question: "Why do poor people do things that seem so self-destructive?" Here are some excerpts from her virally popular five-page response, which is included in the first chapter:

I know how to cook. I had to take Home Ec. to graduate high school. Most people on my level didn't. Broccoli is intimidating. You have to have a working stove, and pots, and spices, and you'll have to do the dishes no matter how tired you are or they'll attract bugs. It is a huge new skill for a lot of people. That's not great, but it's true. And if you fuck it up, you could make your family sick. We have learned not to try too hard to be middle class. It never works out well and always makes you feel worse for having tried and failed yet again. Better not to try. It makes more sense to get food that you know will be palatable and cheap and that keeps well. Junk food is a pleasure that we are allowed to have; why would we give that up? We have very few of them.

and

I smoke. It's expensive. It's also the best option. You see, I am always, always exhausted. It's a stimulant. When I am too tired to walk one more step, I can smoke and go for another hour. When I am enraged and beaten down and incapable of accomplishing one more thing, I can smoke and I feel a little better, just for a minute. It is the only relaxation I am allowed. It is not a good decision, but it is the only one that I have access to. It is the only thing I have found that keeps me from collapsing or exploding.

This book is an expansion on that essay. It's an entry in a growing genre of examinations of what it means to be poor in the United States in the 21st century. Unlike most of those examinations, it isn't written by an outsider performing essentially anthropological field work. It's one of the rare books written by someone who is herself poor and had the combination of skill and viral fame required to get an opportunity to talk about it in her own words.

I haven't had it worse than anyone else, and actually, that's kind of the point. This is just what life is for roughly a third of the country. We all handle it in our own ways, but we all work in the same jobs, live in the same places, feel the same sense of never quite catching up. We're not any happier about the exploding welfare rolls than anyone else is, believe me. It's not like everyone grows up and dreams of working two essentially meaningless part-time jobs while collecting food stamps. It's just that there aren't many other options for a lot of people.

I didn't find this book back in 2014 when it was published. I found it in 2020 during Tirado's second round of Internet fame: when the police shot out her eye with "non-lethal" rounds while she was covering the George Floyd protests as a photojournalist. In characteristic fashion, she subsequently reached out to the other people who had been blinded by the police, used her temporary fame to organize crowdfunded support for others, and is planning on having "try again" tattooed over the scar. That will give you a feel for the style of this book. Tirado is blunt, opinionated, honest, and full speed ahead. It feels weird to call this book delightful since it's fundamentally about the degree to which the United States is failing a huge group of its citizens and making their lives miserable, but there is something so refreshing and clear-headed about Tirado's willingness to tell you the straight truth about her life. It's empathy delivered with the subtlety of a brick, but also with about as much self-pity as a brick. Tirado is not interested in making you feel sorry for her; she's interested in you paying attention.

I don't get much of my own time, and I am vicious about protecting it. For the most part, I am paid to pretend that I am inhuman, paid to cater to both the reasonable and unreasonable demands of the general public. So when I'm off work, feel free to go fuck yourself. The times that I am off work, awake, and not taking care of life's details are few and far between. It's the only time I have any autonomy. I do not choose to waste that precious time worrying about how you feel. Worrying about you is something they pay me for; I don't work for free.

If you've read other books on this topic (Emily Guendelsberger's On the Clock is still the best of those I've read), you probably won't get many new facts from Hand to Mouth. I think this book is less important for the policy specifics than it is for who is writing it (someone who is living that life and can be honest about it) and the depth of emotional specifics that Tirado brings to the description. If you have never been poor, you will learn the details of what life is like, but more significantly you'll get a feel for how Tirado feels about it, and while this is one individual perspective (as Tirado stresses, including the fact that, as a white person, there are other aspects of poverty she's not experienced), I think that perspective is incredibly valuable. That said, Hand to Mouth provides even more reinforcement of the importance of universal medical care, the absurdity of not including dental care in even some of the more progressive policy proposals, and the difficulties in the way of universal medical care even if we solve the basic coverage problem. Tirado has significant dental problems due to unrepaired damage from a car accident, and her account reinforces my belief that we woefully underestimate how important good dental care is to quality of life. But providing universal insurance or access is only the start of the problem.

There is a price point for good health in America, and I have rarely been able to meet it. I choose not to pursue treatment if it will cost me more than it will gain me, and my cost-benefit is done in more than dollars. I have to think of whether I can afford any potential treatment emotionally, financially, and timewise. I have to sort out whether I can afford to change my life enough to make any treatment worth it I've been told by more than one therapist that I'd be fine if I simply reduced the amount of stress in my life. It's true, albeit unhelpful. Doctors are fans of telling you to sleep and eat properly, as though that were a thing one can simply do.

That excerpt also illustrates one of the best qualities of this book. So much writing about "the poor" treats them as an abstract problem that the implicitly not-poor audience needs to solve, and this leads rather directly to the endless moralizing as "we" attempt to solve that problem by telling poor people what they need to do. Tirado is unremitting in fighting for her own agency. She has a shitty set of options, but within those options she makes her own decisions. She wants better options and more space in which to choose them, which I think is a much more productive way to frame the moral argument than the endless hand-wringing over how to help "those poor people." This is so much of why I support universal basic income. Just give people money. It's not all of the solution UBI doesn't solve the problem of universal medical care, and we desperately need to find a way to make work less awful but it's the most effective thing we can do immediately. Poor people are, if anything, much better at making consequential financial decisions than rich people because they have so much more practice. Bad decisions are less often due to bad decision-making than bad options and the balancing of objectives that those of us who are not poor don't understand. Hand to Mouth is short, clear, refreshing, bracing, and, as you might have noticed, very quotable. I think there are other books in this genre that offer more breadth or policy insight, but none that have the same feel of someone cutting through the bullshit of lazy beliefs and laying down some truth. If any of the above excerpts sound like the sort of book you would enjoy reading, pick this one up. Rating: 8 out of 10

Any software system has underlying design principles, and any software project has process rules. But I seem to be seeing more often, a pathological pattern where abstract and shakily-grounded broad principles, and even contrived and sophistic objections, are used to block sensible changes. Today I will go through an example in detail, before ending with a plea: PostgreSQL query planner, WITH [MATERIALIZED] optimisation fence Background history PostgreSQL has a sophisticated query planner which usually gets the right answer. For good reasons, the pgsql project has resisted providing lots of knobs to control query planning. But there are a few ways to influence the query planner, for when the programmer knows more than the planner. One of these is the use of a WITH common table expression. In pgsql versions prior to 12, the planner would first make a plan for the WITH clause; and then, it would make a plan for the second half, counting the WITH clause's likely output as a given. So WITH acts as an "optimisation fence". This was documented in the manual - not entirely clearly, but a careful reading of the docs reveals this behaviour:

The WITH query will generally be evaluated as written, without suppression of rows that the parent query might discard afterwards.

Users (authors of applications which use PostgreSQL) have been using this technique for a long time. New behaviour in PostgreSQL 12 In PostgreSQL 12 upstream were able to make the query planner more sophisticated. In particular, it is now often capable of looking "into" the WITH common table expression. Much of the time this will make things better and faster. But if WITH was being used for its side-effect as an optimisation fence, this change will break things: queries that ran very quickly in earlier versions might now run very slowly. Helpfully, pgsql 12 still has a way to specify an optimisation fence: specifying WITH ... AS MATERIALIZED in the query. So far so good. Upgrade path for existing users of WITH fence But what about the upgrade path for existing users of the WITH fence behaviour? Such users will have to update their queries to add AS MATERIALIZED. This is a small change. Having to update a query like this is part of routine software maintenance and not in itself very objectionable. However, this change cannnot be made in advance because pgsql versions prior to 12 will reject the new syntax. So the users are in a bit of a bind. The old query syntax can be unuseably slow with the new database and the new syntax is rejected by the old database. Upgrading both the database and the application, in lockstep, is a flag day upgrade, which every good sysadmin will want to avoid. A solution to this problem Colin Watson proposed a very simple solution: make the earlier PostgreSQL versions accept the new MATERIALIZED syntax. This is correct since the new syntax specifies precisely the actual behaviour of the old databases. It has no deleterious effect on any users of older pgsql versions. It makes it possible to add the new syntax to the application, before doing the database upgrade, decoupling the two upgrades. Colin Watson even provided an implementation of this proposal. The solution is rejected by upstream Unfortunately upstream did not accept this idea. You can read the whole thread yourself if you like. But in summary, the objections were (italic indicates literal quotes):

• New features don't gain a backpatch. This is a project policy. Of course this is not a new feature, and if it is an exception should be made. This was explained clearly in the thread.
• I'm not sure the "we don't want to upgrade application code at the same time as the database" is really tenable. This is quite an astonishing statement, particularly given the multiple users who said they wanted to do precisely that.
• I think we could find cases where we caused worse breaks between major versions. Paraphrasing: "We've done worse things in the past so we should do this bad thing too". WTF?
• One disadvantage is that this will increase confusion for users, who'll get used to the behavior on 12, and then they'll get confused on older releases. This seems highly contrived. Surely the number of people who are likely to suffer this confusion is tiny. Providing the new syntax in old versions (including of course the appropriate changes to the docs everywhere) might well make such confusion less rather than more likely.
• [Poster is concerned about] 11.6 and up allowing a syntax that 11.0-11.5 don't. People are likely to write code relying on this and then be surprised when it doesn't work on a slightly older server. And, similarly: we'll then have a lot more behavior differences between minor releases. Again this seems a contrived and unconvincing objection. As that first poster even notes: Still, is that so much different from cases where we fix a bug that prevented some statement from working? No, it isn't.
• if we started looking we'd find many changes every year that we could justify partially or completely back-porting on similar grounds ... we'll certainly screw it up sometimes. This is a slippery slope argument. But there is no slippery slope: in particular, the proposed change does not change any of the substantive database logic, and the upstream developers will hardly have any difficulty rejecting future more risky backport proposals.
• if you insist on using the same code with pre-12 and post-12 releases, this should be achievable (at least in most cases) by using the "offset 0" trick. What? First I had heard of it but this in fact turns out to be true! Read more about this, below...

I find these extremely unconvincing, even taken together. Many of them are very unattractive things to hear one's upstream saying. At best they are knee-jerk and inflexible application of very general principles. The authors of these objections seem to have lost sight of the fact that these principles have a purpose. When these kind of software principles work against their purposes, they should be revised, or exceptions made. At worst, it looks like a collective effort to find reasons - any reasons, no matter how bad - not to make this change. The OFFSET 0 trick One of the responses in the thread mentions OFFSET 0. As part of writing the queries in the Xen Project CI system, and preparing for our system upgrade, I had carefully read the relevant pgsql documentation. This OFFSET 0 trick was new to me. But, now that I know the answer, it is easy to provide the right search terms and find, for example, this answer on stackmumble. Apparently adding a no-op OFFSET 0 to the subquery defeats the pgsql 12 query planner's ability to see into the subquery.

I think OFFSET 0 is the better approach since it's more obviously a hack showing that something weird is going on, and it's unlikely we'll ever change the optimiser behaviour around OFFSET 0 ... wheras hopefully CTEs will become inlineable at some point CTEs became inlineable by default in PostgreSQL 12.

So in fact there is a syntax for an optimisation fence that is accepted by both earlier and later PostgreSQL versions. It's even recommended by pgsql devs. It's just not documented, and is described by pgsql developers as a "hack". Astonishingly, the fact that it is a "hack" is given as a reason to use it! Well, I have therefore deployed this "hack". No doubt it will stay in our codebase indefinitely. Please don't be like that! I could come up with a lot more examples of other projects that have exhibited similar arrogance. It is becoming a plague! But every example is contentious, and I don't really feel I need to annoy a dozen separate Free Software communities. So I won't make a laundry list of obstructiveness. If you are an upstream software developer, or a distributor of software to users (eg, a distro maintainer), you have a lot of practical power. In theory it is Free Software so your users could just change it themselves. But for a user or downstream, carrying a patch is often an unsustainable amount of work and risk. Most of us have patches we would love to be running, but which we haven't even written because simply running a nonstandard build is too difficult, no matter how technically excellent our delta. As an upstream, it is very easy to get into a mindset of defending your code's existing behaviour, and to turn your project's guidelines into inflexible rules. Constant exposure to users who make silly mistakes, and rudely ask for absurd changes, can lead to core project members feeling embattled. But there is no need for an upstream to feel embattled! You have the vast majority of the power over the software, and over your project communication fora. Use that power consciously, for good. I can't say that arrogance will hurt you in the short term. Users of software with obstructive upstreams do not have many good immediate options. But we do have longer-term choices: we can choose which software to use, and we can choose whether to try to help improve the software we use. After reading Colin's experience, I am less likely to try to help improve the experience of other PostgreSQL users by contributing upstream. It doesn't seem like there would be any point. Indeed, instead of helping the PostgreSQL community I am now using them as an example of bad practice. I'm only half sorry about that.

comments

This is a curiously poignant work to me that I doubt I would ever be able to communicate. I found it about fifteen years ago, along with a friend who I am quite regrettably no longer in regular contact with, so there was some complicated nostalgia entangled with rediscovering it today. What might I say about it instead? One tell-tale sign of 'good' art is that you can find something new in it, or yourself, each time. In this sense, despite The Bringers of Beethoven being more than a little ridiculous, it is somehow 'good' music to me. For example, it only really dawned on me now that the whole poem is an allegory for a GDR-like totalitarianism. But I also realised that it is not an accident that it is Beethoven himself (quite literally the soundtrack for Enlightenment humanism) that is being weaponised here, rather than some fourth-rate composer of military marches or one with a problematic past. That is to say, not only is the poem arguing that something universally recognised as an unalloyed good can be subverted for propagandistic ends, but that is precisely the point being made by the regime. An inverted Clockwork Orange, if you like. Yet when I listen to it again I can't help but laugh. I think of the 18th-century poet Alexander Pope, who first used the word bathos to refer to those abrupt and often absurd transitions from the elevated to the ordinary, contrasting it with the concept of pathos, the sincere feeling of sadness and tragedy. I can't think of two better words.

Review: The Fifth Risk, by Michael Lewis

Publisher:	W.W. Norton
Copyright:	2018
Printing:	2019
ISBN:	0-393-35745-7
Format:	Kindle
Pages:	254

The Fifth Risk starts with the presidential transition. Max Stier, the first person profiled by Lewis in this book, is the founder of the Partnership for Public Service. That foundation helped push through laws to provide more resources and structure for the transition of the United States executive branch from one president to the next. The goal was to fight wasted effort, unnecessary churn, and pointless disruption in the face of each administration's skepticism about everyone who worked for the previous administration.

"It's Groundhog Day," said Max. "The new people come in and think that the previous administration and the civil service are lazy or stupid. Then they actually get to know the place they are managing. And when they leave, they say, 'This was a really hard job, and those are the best people I've ever worked with.' This happens over and over and over."

By 2016, Stier saw vast improvements, despite his frustration with other actions of the Obama administration. He believed their transition briefings were one of the best courses ever produced on how the federal government works. Then that transition process ran into Donald Trump. Or, to be more accurate, that transition did not run into Donald Trump, because neither he nor anyone who worked for him were there. We'll never know how good the transition information was because no one ever listened to or read it. Meetings were never scheduled. No one showed up. This book is not truly about the presidential transition, though, despite its presence as a continuing theme. The Fifth Risk is, at its heart, an examination of government work, the people who do it, why it matters, and why you should care about it. It's a study of the surprising and misunderstood responsibilities of the departments of the United States federal government. And it's a series of profiles of the people who choose this work as a career, not in the upper offices of political appointees, but deep in the civil service, attempting to keep that system running. I will warn now that I am far too happy that this book exists to be entirely objective about it. The United States desperately needs basic education about the government at all levels, but particularly the federal civil service. The public impression of government employees is skewed heavily towards the small number of public-facing positions and towards paperwork frustrations, over which the agency usually has no control because they have been sabotaged by Congress (mostly by Republicans, although the Democrats get involved occasionally). Mental images of who works for the government are weirdly selective. The Coast Guard could say "I'm from the government and I'm here to help" every day, to the immense gratitude of the people they rescue, but Reagan was still able to use that as a cheap applause line in his attack on government programs. Other countries have more functional and realistic social attitudes towards their government workers. The United States is trapped in a politically-fueled cycle of contempt and ignorance. It has to stop. And one way to help stop it is someone with Michael Lewis's story-telling skills writing a different narrative. The Fifth Risk is divided into a prologue about presidential transitions, three main parts, and an afterword (added in current editions) about a remarkable government worker whom you likely otherwise would never hear about. Each of the main parts talks about a different federal department: the Department of Energy, the Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Commerce. In keeping with the theme of the book, the people Lewis profiles do not do what you might expect from the names of those departments. Lewis's title comes from his discussion with John MacWilliams, a former Goldman Sachs banker who quit the industry in search of more personally meaningful work and became the chief risk officer for the Department of Energy. Lewis asks him for the top five risks he sees, and if you know that the DOE is responsible for safeguarding nuclear weapons, you will be able to guess several of them: nuclear weapons accidents, North Korea, and Iran. If you work in computer security, you may share his worry about the safety of the electrical grid. But his fifth risk was project management. Can the government follow through on long-term hazardous waste safety and cleanup projects, despite constant political turnover? Can it attract new scientists to the work of nuclear non-proliferation before everyone with the needed skills retires? Can it continue to lay the groundwork with basic science for innovation that we'll need in twenty or fifty years? This is what the Department of Energy is trying to do. Lewis's profiles of other departments are similarly illuminating. The Department of Agriculture is responsible for food stamps, the most effective anti-poverty program in the United States with the possible exception of Social Security. The section on the Department of Commerce is about weather forecasting, specifically about NOAA (the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). If you didn't know that all of the raw data and many of the forecasts you get from weather apps and web sites are the work of government employees, and that AccuWeather has lobbied Congress persistently for years to prohibit the NOAA from making their weather forecasts public so that AccuWeather can charge you more for data your taxes already paid for, you should read this book. The story of American contempt for government work is partly about ignorance, but it's also partly about corporations who claim all of the credit while selling taxpayer-funded resources back to you at absurd markups. The afterword I'll leave for you to read for yourself, but it's the story of Art Allen, a government employee you likely have never heard of but whose work for the Coast Guard has saved more lives than we are able to measure. I found it deeply moving. If you, like I, are a regular reader of long-form journalism and watch for new Michael Lewis essays in particular, you've probably already read long sections of this book. By the time I sat down with it, I think I'd read about a third in other forms on-line. But the profiles that I had already read were so good that I was happy to read them again, and the additional stories and elaboration around previously published material was more than worth the cost and time investment in the full book.

It was never obvious to me that anyone would want to read what had interested me about the United States government. Doug Stumpf, my magazine editor for the past decade, persuaded me that, at this strange moment in American history, others might share my enthusiasm.

I'll join Michael Lewis in thanking Doug Stumpf. The Fifth Risk is not a proposal for how to fix government, or politics, or polarization. It's not even truly a book about the Trump presidency or about the transition. Lewis's goal is more basic: The United States government is full of hard-working people who are doing good and important work. They have effectively no public relations department. Achievements that would result in internal and external press releases in corporations, not to mention bonuses and promotions, go unnoticed and uncelebrated. If you are a United States citizen, this is your government and it does important work that you should care about. It deserves the respect of understanding and thoughtful engagement, both from the citizenry and from the politicians we elect. Rating: 10 out of 10

Review: Two Serpents Rise, by Max Gladstone

Series:	Craft #2
Publisher:	Tor
Copyright:	October 2013
ISBN:	1-4668-0204-9
Format:	Mobi
Pages:	350

This is the second book in the Craft Sequence, coming after Three Parts Dead, but it's not a sequel. The only thing shared between the books is the same universe and magical system. Events in Two Serpents Rise were sufficiently distant from the events of the first book that it wasn't obvious (nor did it matter) where it fit chronologically. Caleb is a gambler and an investigator for Red King Consolidated, the vast firm that controls the water supply, and everything else, in the desert city of Dresediel Lex. He has a fairly steady and comfortable job in a city that's not comfortable for many, one of sharp divisions between rich and poor and which is constantly one water disturbance away from riot. His corporate work life frustrates his notorious father, a legendary priest of the old gods who were defeated by the Red King and who continues to fight an ongoing terrorist resistance to the new corporate order. But Caleb has as little as possible to do with that. Two Serpents Rise opens with an infiltration of the Bright Mirror Reservoir, one of the key components of Dresediel Lex's water supply. It's been infested with Tzimet: demon-like creatures that, were they to get into the city's water supply, would flow from faucets and feed on humans. Red King Incorporated discovered this one and sealed the reservoir before the worst could happen, but it's an unsettling attack. And while Caleb is attempting to determine what happened, he has an unexpected encounter with a cliff runner: a daredevil parkour enthusiast with an unexpected amulet of old Craft that would keep her invisible from most without the magical legacy Caleb is blessed (or cursed) with. He doesn't think her presence is related to the attack, but he can't be sure, particularly with the muddling fact that he finds her personally fascinating. Like Three Parts Dead, you could call Two Serpents Rise an urban fantasy in that it's a fantasy that largely takes place in cities and is concerned with such things as infrastructure, politics, and the machinery of civilization. However, unlike Three Parts Dead, it takes itself much more seriously and has less of the banter and delightful absurdity of the previous book. The identification of magic with contracts and legalities is less amusingly creative here and more darkly sinister. Partly this is because the past of Dresediel Lex is full of bloodthirsty gods and human sacrifice, and while Red King Consolidated has put an end to that practice, it lurks beneath the surface and is constantly brought to mind by some grisly artifacts. I seem to always struggle with fantasy novels based loosely on central American mythology. An emphasis on sacrifice and terror always seems to emerge from that background, and it verges too close to horror for me. It also seems prone to clashes of divine power and whim instead of thoughtful human analysis. That's certainly the case here: instead of Tara's creative sleuthing and analysis, Caleb's story is more about uncertainty, obsession, gambling, and shattering revelations. Magical rituals are described more in terms of their emotional impact than their world-building magical theory. I think this is mostly a matter of taste, and it's possible others would like Two Serpents Rise better than the previous book, but it wasn't as much my thing. The characters are a mixed bag. Caleb was a bit too passive to me, blown about by his father and his employer and slow to make concrete decisions. Mal was the highlight of the book for me, but I felt at odds with the author over that, which made the end of the book somewhat frustrating. Caleb has some interesting friends, but this is one of those books where I would have preferred one of the supporting cast to be the protagonist. That said, it's not a bad book. There are some very impressive set pieces, the supporting cast is quite good, and I am wholeheartedly in favor of fantasy novels that are built around the difficulties of water supply to a large, arid city. This sort of thing has far more to do with human life than the never-ending magical wars over world domination that most fantasy novels focus on, and it's not at all boring when told properly. Gladstone is a good writer, and despite the focus of this book not being as much my cup of tea, I'll keep reading this series. Followed by Full Fathom Five. Rating: 7 out of 10

Today I ended reading an interesting article by the 4th spanish ISP regarding IPv6 and CGNAT. The article is in spanish, but I will translate the most important statements here. Having a spanish Internet operator to talk about this subject is itself good news. We have been lacking any news regarding IPv6 in our country for years. I mean, no news from private operators. Public networks like the one where I develop my daily job has been offering native IPv6 since almost a decade The title of the article is What is CGNAT and why is it used . They start by admiting that this technique is used to address the issue of IPv4 exhaustion. Good. They move on to say that IPv6 was designed to address IPv4 exhaustion. Great. Then, they state that the internet network is not ready for IPv6 support . Also that IPv6 has the handicap of many websites not supporting it . Sorry? That is not true. If they refer to the core of internet (i.e, RIRs, interexchangers, root DNS servers, core BGP routers, etc) they have been working with IPv6 for ages now. If they refer to something else, for example Google, Wikipedia, Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, Netflix or any random hosting company, they do support IPv6 as well. Hosting companies which don t support IPv6 are only a few, at least here in Europe. The traffic to/from these services is clearly the vast majority of the traffic traveling in the wires nowaday. And they support IPv6. The article continues defending CGNAT. They refer to IPv6 as an alternative to CGNAT. No, sorry, CGNAT is an alternative to you not doing your IPv6 homework. The article ends by insinuing that CGNAT is more secure and useful than IPv6. That s the final joke. They mention some absurd example of IP cams being accessed from the internet by anyone. Sure, by using CGNAT you are indeed making the network practically one-way only. There exists RFC7021 which refers to the big issues of a CGNAT network. So, by using CGNAT you sacrifice a lot of usability in the name of security. This supposed security can be replicated by the most simple possible firewall, which could be deployed in Dual Stack IPv4/IPv6 using any modern firewalling system, like nftables. (Here is a good blogpost of RFC7021 for spanish readers: Midiendo el impacto del Carrier-Grade NAT sobre las aplicaciones en red) By the way, Google kindly provides some statistics regarding their IPv6 traffic. These stats clearly show an exponential growth: Others ISP operators are giving IPv6 strong precedence over IPv4, that s the case of Verizon in USA: Verizon Static IP Changes IPv4 to Persistent Prefix IPv6. My article seems a bit like a rant, but I couldn t miss the oportunity to claim for native IPv6. None of the major spanish ISP have IPv6.

Name: Alternative Fact
Level: 0
School: EN
Time: 1 action
Range: global, contagious
Components: V, S, M (one racial, cultural or religious minority to blame)
Duration: Permanent (irrevocable)
Classes: Cleric, (Grand) Wizard, Con-man Politician The caster can tell any lie, no matter how absurd or outrageous (in fact, the more outrageous the better), and anyone hearing it (or hearing about it later) with an INT of 10 or less will believe it instantly, with no saving throw. They will defend their new belief to the death theirs or yours. This belief can not be disbelieved, nor can it be defeated by any form of education, logic, evidence, or reason. It is completely incurable. Dispel Magic does not work against it, and Remove Curse is also ineffectual. New D&D Cantrip is a post from: Errata

In one of the good parts of the very mixed bag that is "Lo and Behold: Reveries of the Connected World", Werner Herzog asks his interviewees what the Internet might dream of, if it could dream. The best answer he gets is along the lines of: The Internet of before dreamed a dream of the World Wide Web. It dreamed some nodes were servers, and some were clients. And that dream became current reality, because that's the essence of the Internet. Three years ago, it seemed like perhaps another dream was developing post-Snowden, of dissolving the distinction between clients and servers, connecting peer-to-peer using addresses that are also cryptographic public keys, so authentication and encryption and authorization are built in. Telehash is one hopeful attempt at this, others include snow, cjdns, i2p, etc. So far, none of them seem to have developed into a widely used network, although any of them still might get there. There are a lot of technical challenges due to the current Internet dream/nightmare, where the peers on the edges have multiple barriers to connecting to other peers. But, one project has developed something similar to the new dream, almost as a side effect of its main goals: Tor's onion services. I'd wanted to use such a thing in git-annex, for peer-to-peer sharing and syncing of git-annex repositories. On November 13th, I started building it, using Tor, and I'm releasing it concurrently with this blog post. Now git-annex can serve a repository as a Tor onion service, and that can then be accessed as a git remote, using an url like tor-annex::tungqmfb62z3qirc.onion:42913. All the regular git, and git-annex commands, can be used with such a remote. Tor has a lot of goals for protecting anonymity and privacy. But the important things for this project are just that it has end-to-end encryption, with addresses that are public keys, and allows P2P connections. Building an anonymous file exchange on top of Tor is not my goal -- if you want that, you probably don't want to be exchanging git histories that record every edit to the file and expose your real name by default. Building this was not without its difficulties. Tor onion services were originally intended to run hidden websites, not to connect peers to peers, and this kind of shows.. Tor does not cater to end users setting up lots of Onion services. Either root has to edit the torrc file, or the Tor control port can be used to ask it to set one up. But, the control port is not enabled by default, so you still need to su to root to enable it. Also, it's difficult to find a place to put the hidden service's unix socket file that's writable by a non-root user. So I had to code around this, with a git annex enable-tor that su's to root and sets it all up for you. When two peers are connected over Tor, one knows it's talking to the owner of a particular onion address, but the other peer knows nothing about who's talking to it, by design. This makes authentication harder than it would be in a P2P system with a design like Telehash. So git-annex does its own authentication on top of Tor. With authentication, users would need to exchange absurdly long addresses (over 150 characters) to connect their repositories. One very convenient thing about using XMPP was that a user would have connections to their friend's accounts, so it was easy to share with them. Exchanging long addresses is too hard. This is where Magic Wormhole saved the day. It's a very elegant way to get any two peers in touch with each other, and the users only have to exchange a short code phrase, like "2-mango-delight", which can only be used once. Magic Wormhole makes some security tradeoffs for this simplicity. It's got vulnerabilities to DOS attacks, and its MITM resistance could be improved. But I'm lucky it came along just in time. So, it takes only installing Tor and Magic Wormhole, running two git-annex commands, and exchanging short code phrases with a friend, perhaps over the phone or in an encrypted email, to get your git-annex repositories connected and syncing over Tor. See the documentation for details. Also, the git-annex webapp allows setting the same thing up point-and-click style. The Tor project blog has throughout December been featuring all kinds of projects that are using Tor. Consider this a late bonus addition to that. ;) I hope that Tor onion services will continue to develop to make them easier to use for peer-to-peer systems. We can still dream a better Internet.

---

This work was made possible by all my supporters on Patreon.

I dunno if people heard or didn t hear about the demonetisation of INR 500 and INR 1000 which happened in India on 8th November 2016 with new currency designed in India of INR 2000 and INR 500. What they did was from that moment onwards, paper currency of INR 500 and INR 1000 notes were declared invalid except few places (Government Hospitals, Petrol Pumps, Booking of Air and Train tickets) . The reasons given were as a. End of corruption There is/was suspicion that there are people who have loads of unaccounted wealth which they keep in the form of Cash in hand, b. Charge against fake/duplicate currency There is/was suspicion that quite a bit of the money esp, high value notes such as INR 500 and INR 1000, so having made them illegal, people had to hand over cash to banks and fake money would go outside the system. c. Terror funding This is related with the above point. There is a popular theory/myth/fact that terrorists use fake money to buy people, arms and ammunition while further devaluing the value of INR against dollar and basket of other high-value currencies that Indian currency follows/bases itself on. Each of these theories/myths/facts has been contested. Every day we are seeing and reading reports of people being caught with new currency in absurd numbers while RBI , our central bank and Lender of Last Resort has had to play multiple roles such as policing along with the country s Income Tax Department as well as pumping in new notes of the NEW INR 2000/- and INR 500/- into ATM s and Bank branches around the country. Now while the above may seem to be reasonable, there have been multiple factors which has made the whole exercise less effective while implementing a. Banking reach While India does and can boast of somewhat good indicators of banking reach . But Quarter of these accounts were opened only in the last couple of years under the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhana Yojana . There are quite a few limitations of such accounts. It is a good scheme as if you develop a good rapport with a bank and show good credit/debit understanding then there is possibility to move to normal full-fledged bank account. Almost all of these accounts had zero-balances till the demonetization move. Many of these accounts are suspected to have been conduits to convert black money to white as the Govt. had said it will not scrutinize small savings bank accounts. Also many bank accounts historically have laid dormant over the years. One of my first jobs was of a data entry operator in a bank and I used to see hundreds of bank accounts lying dormant for years together. This was in bank digitization in early 90s. Small Savings accounts would not be scrutinized if they bring upto INR 250000 while Jan Dhan accounts have an upper limit of only INR 50000 . Even then, it has lead to a huge surge in balances specifically in Zero balances account. What begs the question is if it is their hard-earned money why hadn t they deposited money before 8th November 2016. While I can t speak about them, I can certainly speak about myself. I hardly keep at the most INR INR 5/10K for medical emergencies in-house for number of years. Unless you are a businessman who has need of cash or have some function, nobody that I know would keep such amounts in their homes, simply for the possibility of theft in homes. So how did such people who are not able to open a full-fledged saving account get access to such large amounts? In most public sector banks, to have a full-fledged savings account the only requirements are a. Have INR 500 to 1000 as balance at all times.
b. Have permanent identity and residential proof
c. Two photographs
d. 2-3 people who are account holders who can act as guarantor. Of the above, b. and d. are probably sticking points for most migrants, while d. may be a sticking point for labourers, craftsman etc. hence the need for that specific scheme. Which leads to the natural suspicion that they may have been white-washing somebody s untaxed, unaccounted money which is being put into bank and made into legitimate white money. People do not have to file an Income Tax Return (ITR) unless they earn more than 250,000 in a single financial year. One good off-shot of the scheme though is the transparency gained about Bank Mitras b. Number of banks, quality of Bank services, number of people per bank at least in Nationalized Banks leaves much to be desired. We can t even try to compare with other BRIC countries, leave alone Germany. One another positive off-shoot has been the introduction of Mobile ATM Vans around the country. I had experienced such vans in Mumbai since ages, but not anywhere else. I do hope that both Bank Mitras as well as such Van Mobile ATMs happen more. There are huge swathes of people who are currently unbanked. Getting them into the banking infrastructure, getting them to *think* about taking rational financial decisions, i.e. saving and spending, different types of saving etc. should not make citizens and the banking systems more productive and efficient, but hopefully improves our GDP and make it more resilient to any outside financial shocks. c. Many bank websites have everything in English. That norm needs to change. I do have few queries though, one of the countries who is supposed to be a prominent supporter and user of cashless society is supposed to be Canada. Could any Canadians (also because debconf is going to happen in Canada in 2017) share how and if they had seen the Canadian banking system evolve in their country ? Also how much of Canada s economy is cashless i.e used to Electronic Money Transfer and other means (but not cash) and how much is cash, more in day-to-day usage and transactions. I am trying to get people s perspective rather than some website which may serve only raw numbers, although even that would be appreciable. Also what, if any charges/commission are paid to a Canadian bank for paying via card/electronic money transfer. I ask as India has reduced charges overall to 1% from 2% for making transactions upto INR 2000 in a day. There has also been recent talk of plastic notes instead of paper currency. Plastic notes are supposed to be more copy-proof and also will work for much longer time. They will not soil as paper notes do. How have countries been looking at Plastic currencies. I do suspect there would be issues while destroying plastic money vis-a-vis paper currencies. A sort of interesting discussion that I had with Bernelle before venturing into South Africa was asking her about monetary transactions in SA. She had replied that the highest denomination notes was 200 ZAR which is roughly equal to ( ZAR 200 x 5 = INR 1000) . What is/was interesting that Bernelle told me to be careful and as far as possible not to show 200 ZAR note, whereas in India, even the cheapest worker I have met, they have seen and used INR 1000 note. The context of the discussion was being safe in South Africa and doing transactions with people around as to what works. It would be curiouser to know how things work in Canada for instance ? Also has Canada or any other country have experimented with plastic notes. If yes, how has the experience been ? I would have to say this is in no way a definitive guide of the different impressions and repercussion that the decision and the way it s playing out even now. Another thing, while researching for the article there were lots of interesting knowledge, for e.g. the Big Mac Index and it s limitations which I didn t know how to integrate into the decision and Policy taken. I also came to know/saw that lots of Policy initiatives being taken by the current (NDA)Government is similar to initiatives taken elsewhere in the world.. Whether the Policy would be fruitful in getting the desired outcome or would it lead to more chaos and down-turn will know in next quarter only. It would be nice and interesting if people have observed something similar in their country s economic policies as well.
Filed under: Miscellenous Tagged: #Bank Mitra, #Bank reach, #blackmoney, #debconf17, #Demonetisation, #fake currencies, #full-fledged savings account, #Jan Dhan scheme, #Moile ATM Van, #Plastic money, #Public Sector Banks (PSB), #Reserve Bank of India, Big Mac Index

My descent began with a user reporting a bug and I fear I am still on my way down.

The bug was simple enough, a windows bitmap file caused NetSurf to crash. Pretty quickly this was tracked down to the libnsbmp library attempting to decode the file. As to why we have a heavily used library for bitmaps? I am afraid they are part of every icon file and many websites still have favicons using that format.

Some time with a hex editor and the file format specification soon showed that the image in question was malformed and had a bad offset header entry. So I was faced with two issues, firstly that the decoder crashed when presented with badly encoded data and secondly that it failed to deal with incorrect header data.

This is typical of bug reports from real users, the obvious issues have already been encountered by the developers and unit tests formed to prevent them, what remains is harder to produce. After a debugging session with Valgrind and electric fence I discovered the crash was actually caused by running off the front of an allocated block due to an incorrect bounds check. Fixing the bounds check was simple enough as was working round the bad header value and after adding a unit test for the issue I almost moved on.

Almost...

We already used the bitmap test suite of images to check the library decode which was giving us a good 75% or so line coverage (I long ago added coverage testing to our CI system) but I wondered if there was a test set that might increase the coverage and perhaps exercise some more of the bounds checking code. A bit of searching turned up the american fuzzy lop (AFL) projects synthetic corpora of bmp and ico images.

After checking with the AFL authors that the images were usable in our project I added them to our test corpus and discovered a whole heap of trouble. After fixing more bounds checks and signed issues I finally had a library I was pretty sure was solid with over 85% test coverage.

Then I had the idea of actually running AFL on the library. I had been avoiding this because my previous experimentation with other fuzzing utilities had been utter frustration and very poor return on investment of time. Following the quick start guide looked straightforward enough so I thought I would spend a short amount of time and maybe I would learn a useful tool.

I downloaded the AFL source and built it with a simple make which was an encouraging start. The library was compiled in debug mode with AFL instrumentation simply by changing the compiler and linker environment variables.

$ LD=afl-gcc CC=afl-gcc AFL_HARDEN=1 make VARIANT=debug test
afl-cc 2.32b by <lcamtuf@google.com>
afl-cc 2.32b by <lcamtuf@google.com>
 COMPILE: src/libnsbmp.c
afl-cc 2.32b by <lcamtuf@google.com>
afl-as 2.32b by <lcamtuf@google.com>
[+] Instrumented 751 locations (64-bit, hardened mode, ratio 100%).
      AR: build-x86_64-linux-gnu-x86_64-linux-gnu-debug-lib-static/libnsbmp.a
 COMPILE: test/decode_bmp.c
afl-cc 2.32b by <lcamtuf@google.com>
afl-as 2.32b by <lcamtuf@google.com>
[+] Instrumented 52 locations (64-bit, hardened mode, ratio 100%).
    LINK: build-x86_64-linux-gnu-x86_64-linux-gnu-debug-lib-static/test_decode_bmp
afl-cc 2.32b by <lcamtuf@google.com>
 COMPILE: test/decode_ico.c
afl-cc 2.32b by <lcamtuf@google.com>
afl-as 2.32b by <lcamtuf@google.com>
[+] Instrumented 65 locations (64-bit, hardened mode, ratio 100%).
    LINK: build-x86_64-linux-gnu-x86_64-linux-gnu-debug-lib-static/test_decode_ico
afl-cc 2.32b by <lcamtuf@google.com>
Test bitmap decode
Tests:606 Pass:606 Error:0
Test icon decode
Tests:392 Pass:392 Error:0
    TEST: Testing complete

I stuffed the AFL build directory on the end of my PATH, created a directory for the output and ran afl-fuzz

afl-fuzz -i test/bmp -o findings_dir -- ./build-x86_64-linux-gnu-x86_64-linux-gnu-debug-lib-static/test_decode_bmp @@ /dev/null

The result was immediate and not a little worrying, within seconds there were crashes and lots of them! Over the next couple of hours I watched as the unique crash total climbed into the triple digits.

I was forced to abort the run at this point as, despite clear warnings in the AFL documentation of the demands of the tool, my laptop was clearly not cut out to do this kind of work and had become distressingly hot.

AFL has a visualisation tool so you can see what kind of progress it is making which produced a graph that showed just how fast it managed to produce crashes and how much the return plateaus after just a few cycles. Although it was finding a new unique crash every ten minutes or so when aborted.

I dove in to analyse the crashes and it immediately became obvious the main issue was caused when the test tool attempted allocations of absurdly large bitmaps. The browser itself uses a heuristic to determine the maximum image size based on used memory and several other values. I simply applied an upper bound of 48 megabytes per decoded image which fits easily within the fuzzers default heap limit of 50 megabytes.

The main source of "hangs" also came from large allocations so once the test was fixed afl-fuzz was re-run with a timeout parameter set to 100ms. This time after several minutes no crashes and only a single hang were found which came as a great relief, at which point my laptop had a hard shutdown due to thermal event!

Once the laptop cooled down I spooled up a more appropriate system to perform this kind of work a 24way 2.1GHz Xeon system. A Debian Jessie guest vm with 20 processors and 20 gigabytes of memory was created and the build replicated and instrumented.

To fully utilise this system the next test run would utilise AFL in parallel mode. In this mode there is a single "master" running all the deterministic checks and many "secondary" instances performing random tweaks.

If I have one tiny annoyance with AFL, it is that breeding and feeding a herd of rabbits by hand is annoying and something I would like to see a convenience utility for.

The warren was left overnight with 19 instances and by morning had generated crashes again. This time though the crashes actually appeared to be real failures.

$ afl-whatsup sync_dir/
Summary stats
=============

       Fuzzers alive : 19
      Total run time : 5 days, 12 hours
         Total execs : 214 million
    Cumulative speed : 8317 execs/sec
       Pending paths : 0 faves, 542 total
  Pending per fuzzer : 0 faves, 28 total (on average)
       Crashes found : 554 locally unique

All the crashing test cases are available and a simple file command immediately showed that all the crashing test files had one thing in common the height of the image was -2147483648 This seemingly odd number is actually meaningful to a programmer, it is the largest negative number which can be stored in a 32bit integer (INT32_MIN) I immediately examined the source code that processes the height in the image header.

if ((width <= 0)   (height == 0))          
        return BMP_DATA_ERROR;
if (height < 0)      
        bmp->reversed = true;   
        height = -height;        
 

The bug is where the height is made a positive number and results in height being set to 0 after the existing check for zero and results in a crash later in execution. A simple fix was applied and test case added removing the crash and any possible future failure due to this.

Another AFL run has been started and after a few hours has yet to find a crash or non false positive hang so it looks like if there are any more crashes to find they are much harder to uncover.

Main lessons learned are:

• AFL is an easy to use and immensely powerful and effective tool. State of the art has taken a massive step forward.
• The test harness is part of the test! make sure it does not behave in a poor manner and cause issues itself.
• Even a library with extensive test coverage and real world users can benefit from this technique. But it remains to be seen how quickly the rate of return will reduce after the initial fixes.
• Use the right tool for the job! Ensure you head the warnings in the manual as AFL uses a lot of resources including CPU, disc and memory.

I've written retrospectively about pristine-tar before, when I stopped maintaining it. So, I'll quote part of that here:

[...] a little bit about the reason I wrote pristine-tar in the
first place. There were two reasons:
1. I was once in a talk where someone mentioned that Ubuntu had/was
   developing something that involved regenerating orig tarballs
   from version control.
   I asked the obvious question: How could that possibly be done
   technically? 
   The (slightly hung over) presenter did not have a satesfactory
   response, so my curiosity was piqued to find a way to do it.
   (I later heard that Ubuntu has been using pristine-tar..)
2. Sometimes code can be subversive. It can change people's perspective
   on a topic, nudging discourse in a different direction. It can even
   point out absurdities in the way things are done. I may or may not
   have accomplished the subversive part of my goals with pristine-tar.
Code can also escape its original intention. Many current uses of
pristine-tar fall into that category. So it seems likely that some
people will want it to continue to work even if it's met the two goals
above already.

For me, the best part of building pristine-tar was finding an answer to the question "How could that possibly be done technically?" It was also pretty cool to be able to use every tarball in Debian as the test suite for pristine-tar. I'm afraid I kind of left Debian in the lurch when I stopped maintaining pristine-tar. "Debian has probably hundreds, if not thousands of git repositories using pristine-tar. We all rely now on an unmaintained, orphaned, and buggy piece of software." -- Norbert Preining So I was relieved when it finally got a new maintainer just recently. Still, I don't expect I'll ever use pristine-tar again. It's the only software I've built in the past ten years that I can say that about. Next: twenty years of free software -- part 6 moreutils

A very weak season, mainly due to two reasons:

• weather: It was just too warm. Pre-season in November things looked hopeful with early snow, but December 2015 was absurdely warm. According to the weather station Dam ls Hertehof (1580m above sea level) there were only three days in December when temperatures fell below 0 Celsius. I had my first snow day on December 6 followed by 3 more days in December (12, 19 and 20) with continuously worsening conditions. I gave it another chance on January 6th, but things had not improved and I paused until January 21, which was the first good day.
• On February 7th 2016 I had a small accident at luging, resulting in a (partially) torn ligament at my left ankle joint. Joy. No snowboarding until March 13. My season ended on April 10, when Warth/Schr cken closed.

Here is the balance sheet:

	2005/06	2006/07	2007/08	2008/09	2009/10	2010/11	2011/12	2012/13	2013/14	2014/15	2015/2016
number of (partial) days	25	17	29	37	30	30	25	23	30	24	17
Dam ls	10	10	5	10	16	23	10	4	29	9	4
Diedamskopf	15	4	24	23	13	4	14	19	1	13	12
Warth/Schr cken	0	3	0	4	1	3	1	0	0	2	1
total meters of altitude	124634	74096	219936	226774	202089	203918	228588	203562	274706	224909	138037
highscore	10247m	8321m	12108m	11272m	11888m	10976m	13076m	13885m	12848m	13278	11015
# of runs	309	189	503	551	462	449	516	468	597	530	354

After finishing the Talos Principle I immediately started to play the extension Road to Gehenna, but was derailed near completion by the incredible Portal Stories: Mel. Now that I finally managed to escape from the test chambers my attention returned to the Road to Gehenna. As with the pair Portal 2 and Portal Stories: Mel, the challenges are going up considerably from the original Talos Principle to the Road to Gehenna. Checking the hours of game play it took me about 24h through all the riddles in Road to Gehenna, but I have to admit, I had some riddles where I needed to cheat. The Road to Gehenna does not bring much new game play elements, but loads of new riddles. And the best of all, playable on Linux! And as with the original game, the graphics are really well done, while still be playable on my Vaio Pro laptop with Intel integrated graphic card a plus that is rare in the world of computer games where everyone is expected to have a high-end nVidia or Radeon card. Ok, there is not much action going on where quick graphic computations are necessary, still the impression of the game is great.
The riddles contain the well known elements (connectors, boxes, jammer, etc), but the settings are often spectacular, sometimes very small and narrow, just a few moves if done in the right order, sometimes like wide open fields with lots of space to explore. Transportation between various islands suspended in the air is with vents, giving you a lot of nice flight time!
If one searches a lot, or uses a bit of cheating, one can find good old friends from the Portal series, burried in the sand in one of the world. This is not the only easter egg hidden in the game, there are actually a lot, some of which I have not seen but only read about afterwards. Guess I need to replay the whole game.
Coming back to the riddles, I really believe that the makers have been ingenious in using the few items at hand to create challenging and surprising riddles. As it is so often, many of the riddles look completely impossible at first glance, and often even after staring at them for tens and tens of minutes. Until (and if) one has the the a-ha effect and understands the trick. This often still needs a lot of handwork and trial-error rounds, but all in all the game is well balanced. What is a bit a pain similar to the original game are collecting the stars to reach the hidden world and free the admin. There the developers overdid it in my opinion, with some rather absurd and complicated stars.
The end of the game, ascension of the messengers, is rather unspectacular. A short discussion on who remains and then a big closing scene with the messenger being beamed up a la Starship Enterprise, and a closing black screen. But well, the fun was with the riddles.
All in all an extension that is well worth the investment if one enjoyed the original Talos, and is looking for rather challenging riddles. Now that I have finished all the Portal and Talos titles, I am hard thinking of what is next looking into Braid Enjoy!

Review: What If?, by Randall Munroe

Publisher:	Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Copyright:	2014
ISBN:	0-544-27299-4
Format:	Hardcover
Pages:	295

This is another one of those reviews that's somewhat pointless to write, at least beyond telling people who for some strange reason aren't xkcd readers that this is a thing that exists in the world. What If? is a collection of essays from that feature on the xkcd web site and new essays in the same vein. (Over half are new to this collection.) If you've read them, you know what to expect; if you haven't, and have any liking at all for odd scientific facts or stick figures, you're in for a treat. So, short review: The subtitle is Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions, and it's exactly what it says on the tin, except that "serious" includes a healthy dose of trademark xkcd humor. Go read what-if.xkcd.com for numerous samples of Munroe's essay style. If you like what you see, this is a whole book of that: a nice, high-quality hardcover (at least the edition I bought), featuring the same mix of text and cartoon commentary, and with new (and in some cases somewhat longer) material. You probably now have all the information necessary to make a purchasing decision. If you need more motivation, particularly to buy a physical copy, the inside of the dust jacket of the hardcover is a detailed, labeled map of the world after a drain in the Marianas Trench has emptied most of the oceans onto Mars. And the book inside the dust jacket is embossed with what happens after the dinosaur on the cover is lowered into, or at least towards, the Great Pit of Carkoon. This made me particularly happy, since too often hardcovers inside the dust jacket look just like every other hardcover except for the spine lettering. Very few of them have embossed Star Wars references. Personally, I think that's a great reason to buy the hardcover even if, like me, you've been following What If? on the web religiously since it started. But of course the real draw is the new material. There's enough of it that I won't try any sort of comprehensive list, but rest assured that it's of equal or better quality than the web-published essays we know and love. My favorite of the new pieces is the answer to the question "what would happen if you made a periodic table out of cube-shaped bricks, where each brick was made of the corresponding element?" As with so many What If? questions, it starts with killing everyone in the vicinity, and then things get weird. Another nice touch in this collection is what I'd call "rejected questions": questions that people submitted but that didn't inspire an essay. Most of these (I wish all) get a single cartoon of reaction to the question itself, which include some of the funniest (and most touching) panels in the book. Ebook formatting has gotten much better, so there's some hope that at least some platforms could do justice to this book with its embedded cartoons. Putting the footnotes properly at the bottom of each page (thank you!) might be a challenge, though. Writing mixed with art is one of the things I think benefits greatly from a physical copy, and the hardcover is a satisfying and beautiful artifact. (I see there's also an audio book, but I'm sure how well that could work; so much of the joy of What If? is the illustrations, and I'm dubious that one could adequately describe them.) Prior web readers will be relieved to know that the mouse-over text is preserved as italic captions under the cartoons, although sadly most cartoons are missing captions. (As I recall, that's also the case for the early web What If? essays, but later essays have mouse-over text for nearly every cartoon.) Anyway, this is a thing that exists. If you follow xkcd, you probably knew that already, given that the book was published last year and I only now got around to reading it. (My current backlog is... impressive.) If you were not previously aware of What If? or of xkcd itself, now you are, and I envy you the joy of discovery. A short bit of reading will tell you for certain whether this is something you want to purchase. If your relationship to physics is at all similar to mine, I suspect the answer will be yes. A small personal note: I just now realized how much the style of What If? resembles the mixed text and illustrations of One Two Three... Infinity. Given how foundational that book was to my love of obscure physics facts, my love of What If? is even less surprising. Rating: 10 out of 10

Finally I found the time and peace to watch one of the strangest movies that I have ever seen, Werner Herzog s (Offical Site, Wikipedia) Fata Morgana (Wikipedia, IMDb). Footage prepared for a SF movie that never realized, converted into an impressionistic allegory and movie full of phantasms.
Fata Morgana is a movie that escapes every description. Having read several critics voices, as well as Herzog s comments in the excellent interview/(auto)biography book Werner Herzog A guide for the perplexed, I was eager to see this old and special movie. Having laid my hand on a collection of Werner Herzog s old movies recently, I prepared some good Japanese sake, and was ready to enjoy the move. The initial sequence of airplanes landing on a very hot day, again and again, sets the stage for a series of dream-like sequences in this movie. Divided into three parts, the movie tells its story only by visual impressions and the reading of the Mayan creation myth Popol Vuh, at times intermixed with some Leonard Cohen songs. Part One Creation introduces the desert as the origin of the world, accompanied by the initial creation myth before humans were formed. Part 2 Paradise is when humans enter into the desert. Full of ramshackle houses and rotten buildings, the contrast of the spoken words and imaginary cannot be more stunning. The final part 3 The Golden Age is full of absurdities and strange appearances, not surprisingly also most humans appear here. Watching this movie is more a visual experience for me than about seeing a story line. While there are many ways to interpret the relation between the Popol Vuh and the movie sequences, for me it is more a visual experiment that tries in some sense to hypnotize the audience. For those who love strange movies, an absolute must. For all others probably a torture.

Review: The Three-Body Problem, by Cixin Liu & Ken Liu

Series:	Three-Body Problem #1
Author:	Liu Cixin ( )
Translator:	Ken Liu
Publisher:	Tor
Copyright:	2006, 2014
Printing:	November 2014
ISBN:	1-4668-5344-1
Format:	Kindle
Pages:	399

Liu Cixin ( ) is one of the best-known and most popular SF authors in China, but, due to the paucity of translated SF in the English-speaking world, was largely unknown to English-speaking SF readers. That made this translation by Ken Liu (no relation) highly anticipated: a window into a large world of SF by authors most of us have never read. And Ken Liu is an excellent writer in his own right (see, for instance, "The Literomancer" or "Altogether Elsewhere, Vast Herds of Reindeer"), which was a hopeful sign for a good translation. Indeed, the translation is very good. One can tell that the book comes from a different literary tradition, but primarily from unusual (to US readers, at least) emotional focal points for the characters and lots of Chinese history that the author feels little need to explain. (Ken Liu adds translator notes for the bits most likely to lose non-Chinese audiences.) I found the characters a bit odd and occasionally hard to identify with, but I didn't mind: it added to the feeling of exploring a slightly different literary tradition with different character conventions. Unfortunately, the end of the book went entirely off the rails, at least for me. The Three-Body Problem opens during the Cultural Revolution, with the murder of Ye Wenjie's father, a physics professor, and the suicide of her advisor and friend. Two years later, she's at a work camp in inner Mongolia, cutting trees, numb, keeping her head down. But a traveling journalist smuggles in a secret copy of Silent Spring and gives it to her. The book both hardens her own belief in the evil of humanity and gets her into deeper trouble when she agrees to recopy a draft of a letter to the central leadership about the environmental devastation caused by the logging. Ye Wenjie is forced to choose permanent exile to an experimental radar facility on a remote mountain in Mongolia. Ye Wenjie is vital to the slowly-developing plot of the book, but this is the last the reader sees of her for some time. Part II jumps to present time and to a different protagonist: Wang Miao, a distinguished nanotechnology researcher who is recruited by the PLA and the police into a secret war room. Distinguished scientists are killing themselves in frighteningly large numbers, including one that Wang Miao had a crush on. She left a suicide note before overdosing on sleeping pills, one that says only, cryptically, that physics doesn't exist. The government is desperate to figure out what's going on. The "radar" facility and the suicide of scientists are linked, of course, but it takes much of the book for Wang Miao and his colleagues to piece together how. Key clues come in the form of an odd puzzle virtual reality MMORPG that becomes a popular sensation. In it, players find themselves on an alien world whose suns rise and set at strange and unpredictable intervals: sometimes far too far away and horribly cold, sometimes far too close and destructively hot, and sometimes not seen for long periods of time. The players can somehow dehydrate themselves and the rest of the population to weather the worst seasons, but life is a constant struggle against apparently unpredictable elements. Despite that, players slowly find ways to build civilizations and attempt to predict the strange cycles of heat and cold. It takes the characters a long time to understand what's happening. Readers will probably be much faster, since they have out-of-band information the characters don't. At first, this game seems entirely unrelated to the suicides of the scientists or, for that matter, to Ye Wenjie, who is easy to almost forget. But they all weave together in a way that's almost compelling. I say almost because the motivations of the characters are quite tangled and interesting, but the science is... awful. Those who have read my other book reviews know that I don't insist on hard science in my SF. Usually I'm willing to roll with it, and I can read past even obvious scientific nonsense. But science is critical to the plot of this book; some very specific actions, with a detailed in-book scientific justifications, are the underpinning of the entire plot. And they make utter nonsense of physics. I've rarely had science in a novel destroy my suspension of disbelief this thoroughly. Physics isn't even alone: biology, chemistry, computing, and astronomy are all in for it as Liu reveals the causes of the book's events. I wanted to be engaged by the conflict of ethics and philosophy that drive the plot, and some of that conflict is quite interesting. But every other page would have another colossal pile of scientific nonsense that would throw me out of the book again, usually in the service of a set piece that missed grand and landed on absurdly silly. Be warned that this book also ends on a bit of a cliff-hanger, and there are two more books in the series. The second has been released in a translated edition, but with a different translator, which is disappointing (Ken Liu did an excellent job); the third isn't out yet. If you can get past the awful science, The Three-Body Problem is doing some interesting things. The characters are a bit wooden and forgettable, but the philosophical problems they encounter are ones I don't see often in western SF. This a refreshing change, and I'm interested enough that I'm still considering picking up the sequels. But the science hurts the book so badly. Followed by The Dark Forest. Rating: 6 out of 10

Review: Let's Pretend This Never Happened, by Jenny Lawson

Publisher:	Berkley
Copyright:	2012, 2013
Printing:	March 2013
ISBN:	0-425-26101-8
Format:	Trade paperback
Pages:	366

Let's Pretend This Never Happened, subtitled (A Mostly True Memoir), is the closest that I've ever found to the book form of a stand-up comedy routine. Lawson grew up in rural Texas with a taxidermist father, frequent contact with animals in various forms of distress, an undiagnosed anxiety disorder, and a talent for creatively freaking out about things that never occur to anyone else. But, more importantly, she has a talent for putting down on paper the random thoughts that go through her head so the rest of us can read them. Not to mention excellent comic timing and absolute mastery of the strangely relevant digression. It's always tricky to review comedy. I think tastes differ more wildly in this genre than any other. Things some people find hilarious others will find offensive or just boring. That may be particularly true of Lawson, who, similar to some of the best stand-up comics, specializes in taking off filters and saying all sorts of offensive things that people might think but not say. This kind of comedy is a knife's edge, since it can easily turn into punching down. Lawson avoids this (rather well, in my opinion) by making herself the punch line of most of the jokes. A pretty typical paragraph of the book, so that you know the sort of thing that you're in for:

The following is a series of actual events pulled form my journal that led me to believe that our home was possessed by demons and/or built over an Indian burial ground. (Also, please note that the first part of this chapter actually happens just before the previous chapter, and the last part of it happens just after it. This could be viewed as "clunky and awkward," but I prefer to think of it as "intellectually challenging and chronologically surreal. Like if Memento was a book. About dead dogs and vaginas and puppets made out of squirrel corpses." You can feel free to use that quote if you're reviewing this chapter, or if you're a student and your teacher asks you, "What was the author trying to say here?" That was it. That's what I was trying to say. That and "Use condoms if you're going to have sex, for God's sake. There are a lot of skanks out there." That's not really covered in this book, but it's still good advice.)

That has a little bit of everything this book had for me: Lawson's somewhat surreal worries, the extended digression, a rhythm that's quite compelling once you start reading it, random uncomfortable topics, and the occasional miss that I don't find funny (the last few sentences). It's all mixed together in a slightly breathless rush of narrative momentum. For more samples, Lawson's writing started as a blog and she's still actively blogging, so you can get a good advance sample by reading some of The Bloggess. Her tone there matches the book closely. What makes this book more than only comedy is that Lawson is very open about her struggles with mental illness (anxiety and depression). A lot of the humor comes from "this is the ridiculous nonsense that my brain throws out on a regular basis" and inviting you to laugh along with her, but the undertone is use of humor as a coping mechanism to deal with anxiety spirals. And alongside that coping mechanism is an open-hearted message of "you are not the only person to have completely irrational reactions to the world please laugh along with mine and feel better about yours." Due to that, the best comparison I can make to another book I've read is to Allie Brosh's Hyperbole and a Half. Brosh is more serious in places, more analytical, and a bit better at generalizing to experiences the reader can identify with. (And, of course, more graphical.) Lawson is more madcap, a bit more manic, and focused on absurd situations that don't normally happen to people. I loved this book from beginning to end, and it had me laughing out-loud in multiple places. Despite being a collection of disconnected stories, it has a rhythm and flow that kept me reading. Some books of this kind are best read in small segments with a break between, but I devoured Let's Pretend This Never Happened in large chunks (and had to be careful about reading it in public and laughing too loudly). Check first whether the sense of humor works for you, but if it does, highly recommended. Rating: 9 out of 10

Only parts of us will ever
touch o n l y parts of others
one s own truth is just that really one s own truth.
We can only share the part that is u n d e r s t o o d b y within another s knowing acceptable t o t h e o t h e r t h e r e f o r e so one
is for most part alone.
As it is meant to be in
evidently in nature at best t h o u g h perhaps it could make
our understanding seek
another s loneliness out.

unpublished poem by Marilyn Monroe, via berlin-artparasites This poem inspired me to put some ideas into words this morning, an attempt to summarize my current working theory of consciousness. Ideas travel through space and time. An idea that exists in my mind is filtered through my ability to express it somehow (words, art, body language, ), and is then interpreted by your mind and its models for understanding the world. This shifts your perspective in some way, some or all of which may be unconscious. When our minds encounter new ideas, they are accepted or rejected, reframed, and integrated with our existing mental models. This process forms a sort of living ecosystem, which maintains equilibrium within the realm of thought. Ideas are born, divide, mutate, and die in the process. Language, culture, education and so on are stable structures which form and support this ecosystem. Consciousness also has analogues of the immune system, for example strongly held beliefs and models which tend to reject certain ideas. Here again these can be unconscious or conscious. I ve seen it happen that if someone hears an idea they simply cannot integrate, they will behave as if they did not hear it at all. Some ideas can be identified as such a serious threat that ignoring them is not enough to feel safe: we feel compelled to eliminate the idea in the external world. The story of Christianity describes a scenario where an idea was so threatening to some people that they felt compelled to kill someone who expressed it. A microcosm of this ecosystem also exists within each individual mind. There are mental structures which we can directly introspect and understand, and others which we can only infer by observing our thoughts and behaviors. These structures communicate with each other, and this communication is limited by their ability to speak each other s language . A dream, for example, is the conveyance of an idea from an unconscious place to a conscious one. Sometimes we get the message, and sometimes we don t. We can learn to interpret, but we can t directly examine and confirm if we re right. As in biology, each part of this process introduces uncountable errors , but the overall system is surprisingly robust and stable. This whole system, with all its many minds interacting, can be thought of as an intelligence unto itself, a gestalt consciousness. This interpretation leads to some interesting further conclusions:

• The notion that an individual person possesses a single, coherent point of view seems nonsensical
• The separation between my mind and your mind seems arbitrary
• The attribution of consciousness only to humans, or only to living beings, seems absurd

Naturally, this is by no means an original idea (can such a thing exist?). It is my own take on the subject, informed both consciously and unconsciously by my own study, first-hand experience, conversations I ve had with others, and so on. It s informed by the countless thinkers who have influenced me. Its expression is limited by my ability to write about it in a way that makes sense to other people.
Maybe some of this makes sense to you, and maybe I seem insane, or maybe both. Hopefully you don t find that you have an inexplicable unconscious desire to kill me!

I was recently asked about some construct in a shell script starting with a colon(:), leading me into a long monologue about it. Afterwards I realized I had forgotten to mention half of the nice things. So here for your amusement some usage for the colon in the shell: To find the meaning of ":" in the bash manpage[1], you have to look at the start of the SHELL BUILTIN COMMANDS section. There you find:

: [arguments]
	No effect; the command does nothing beyond expanding arguments and performing any specified redirections.  A zero exit code is returned.

If you wonder what the difference to true is: I don't know any difference (except that there is no /bin/:) So what is the colon useful for? You can use it if you need a command that does nothing, but still is a command.

• For example, if you want to avoid using a negation (for fear of history expansion still being on by default on a interactive bash or wanting to support ancient shells), you cannot simply write

  if conditon ; then
  	# this will be an error
  else
  	echo condition is false
  fi
  

  but need some command there, for which the colon can be used:

  if conditon ; then
  	: # nothing to do in this case
  else
  	echo condition is false
  fi
  

  To confuse your reader, you can use the fact that the colon ignores it's arguments and you only have normal words there:

  if conditon ; then
  	: nothing to do in this case # <- this works but is not good style
  else
  	echo condition is false
  fi
  

  though I strongly recommend against it (exercise: why did I use a # there for my remark?).
• This of course also works in other cases:

  while processnext ; do
  	:
  done
  

• The ability to ignore the actual arguments (but still processing them as with every command that ignores it arguments) can also be used, like in:

  : $ VARNAME:=default 
  

  which sets VARNAME to a default if unset or empty. (One could also use that the first time it is used, or $ VARNAME:-default everywhere, but this can be more readable).
• In other cases you do not strictly need a command, but using the colon can clear things up, like creating or truncating a file using a redirection:

  : > /path/to/file
  

Then there is more things you can do with the colon, most I'd put under "abuse":

• misuing it for comments:

  : ====== here
  

  While it has the advantage of also showing up in -x output, the to be expected confusion of the reader and the danger of using any shell active character makes this general a bad idea.
• As it practically the same as true it can be used as a shorter form of true. Given that true is more readable that is a bad idea. (At least it isn't as evil as using the empty string to denote true.)

  # bad style!
  if condition ; then doit= ; doit2=: ; else doit=false ; doit2=false ; fi
  if $doit ; then echo condition true ; fi
  if $doit2 && true ; then echo condition true ; fi
  

• Another way to scare people:

  ignoreornot=
  $ignoreornot echo This you can see.
  ignoreornot=:
  $ignoreornot echo This you cannot see.
  

  While it works, I recommend against it: Easily confusing and any > in there or $(...) will likely rain harvoc over you.
• Last and least, one can shadow the built-in colon with a different one. Only useful for obfuscation, and thus likely always evil. :() :&: ;: anyone?

This is of course not a complete list. But unless I missed something else, those are the most common cases I run into. [1] <rant>If you never looked at it, better don't start: the bash manpage is legendary for being quite useless as hiding all information in other information in a quite absurd order. Unless you look at documentation about how to write a shell script parser, then the bash manpage is really what you want to read.</rant>